The Role of Liberation Theology in Addressing Social InjusticeThe Role of Liberation Theology in Addressing Social Injustice
Is Biblical Theology For the Poor?
Liberation theology teaches that truth is not socially, racially, or economically neutral. It emphasizes that the Bible must be interpreted through the lens of the poor and oppressed.
The Bible certainly teaches that Christians should care for the poor and speak out against injustice. But liberation theology takes this a step further by calling for a Church that will take action to change oppressive systems.
1. It is based on Scripture
If you’ve ever heard of biblical theology, it’s likely because it grew out of a movement in Latin America that sought to apply religious faith through aiding poor and oppressed people. The movement was rooted in a deep concern for social injustice and the belief that God has a preference for the poor.
The movement advocated both heightened awareness of the sinning structures that cause social inequality and active participation in changing those structures. To achieve this, ecclesial base communities were created, which were grassroots lay Catholic groups that enabled rural parishes to take control of their spiritual lives without having to wait for priests to visit.
The movement contributed to today’s wide-spread concern with issues of social justice. However, while the Bible certainly teaches followers to care for the poor and speak out against injustice, liberation theology misplaces its emphasis on these issues by placing them on an equal footing with the gospel message.
2. It is based on tradition
The idea behind Liberation theology is that the Bible must be interpreted through the perspective of poor and oppressed people. This approach is rooted in the belief that the most basic injustices, such as poverty and economic inequality, are a result of structural sin. As such, the only way to overcome these problems is to address the root cause of them.
According to the movement, this requires a tectonic shift in emphasis. While there is room for Scripture and church tradition, the truth is based more fundamentally on the experiences of the poor and oppressed. This new emphasis is reflected in the Biblical text in which Mary praises God for having brought down rulers from their thrones and emptied the rich and powerful.
As a result, liberation theology focuses on social justice issues that affect poor and oppressed communities. While this is admirable, it is important to note that the movement does not fully acknowledge or address individual sin and salvation.
3. It is based on experience
While it might seem that liberation theology is based on Scripture, this movement actually draws inspiration from the experiences of poor people. These primarily Catholic theologians felt that the Bible was clear on God’s concern for oppressed people and that the Christian faith should be focused on helping the poor.
They also believed that social injustice was a sin against God and that it needed to be challenged. In addition, they were heavily influenced by Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. In order to avoid being accused of eisegesis, these theologians relied on experience as the starting point for their theology.
This resulted in the creation of tens of thousands of base ecclesial communities, small neighbourhood groups run by lay men and women. The groups worked to integrate spiritual and social issues and, on occasion, they even supported a political party. This stance on political activism has helped to fuel the current concern across Christianity for social justice issues.
4. It is based on faith
Liberation theology is based on faith in Jesus Christ. Its proponents believe that God’s message is one of compassion for the poor and the need to address social injustices. They also emphasize the need for both spiritual and physical needs, a theme that is found throughout the Bible. It is a theology that recognizes that human governance is a major source of poverty and inequality.
While many of its ideas are biblical, it is important to note that it is not without criticism. For example, it ignores the concept of sin as a binary of oppressors and victims. Rather, it promotes the idea that all people are equal in God’s eyes. This view is a departure from traditional theology, which sees sin as a continuum between good and evil. It also overlooks the fact that human conflict stems from a broken fellowship with God. It is this fellowship that must be restored in order to bring peace to the world.
…